For a few years now I've reduced my approach to life to six
simple rules. I don't remember for the most part what
inspired them, but they've proven consistently appropriate to my life. They are as follows:
1. Enjoy yourself.
2. Don't be a jerk.
3. Question everything.
4. Take action.
5. Put hats on robots.
6. Bacon.
Unlike most attempts at laws or commandments, they don't
apply to specific situations, but each apply in many situations (except, of
course, for Rule 5), and they overlap significantly in application. However, they must be interpreted directly
and fully; they must not be interpreted to justify our actions, but our actions
should be made to fit the rules.
For instance, the first rule, "Enjoy yourself", is
not a demand to pursue hedonism and selfish entertainment. If this were the case, the rule would be
"Do what you want". Instead,
the rule demands that we find enjoyment regardless of your situation. Pessimism helps no one, least of all
ourselves. Yet often we've all used the
excuse that we're "having a bad day", and we use this both to keep
ourselves down and to justify our poor behavior around others. We believe sometimes that they should be
trying to make us feel better or at least staying out of our way, but we can
hope at best for the latter, and at worst for confrontation. However, if we try to be happy even when the
universe conspires against us--to smile and be friendly even when we our hearts
are not fully in it--we can make others happy, and then they will be more
inclined to want to make us happy, or, failing that, we might trick ourselves
into being happy.
What most people don't seem to understand is that emotions
often act as feedback loops. Certainly,
other people's emotions are not the sole drive of our emotions, and our
emotions are not forced upon others, but to some significant degree anger tends
to beget anger, happiness begets happiness, and so on. Moreover, anger, sadness, and fear feedback
through simple causality independent of empathy; they tend to cloud our
judgment, and the more we maintain these emotions, the harder it is to figure
out how to create a situation for us to be happy again.
As for the second rule, "Don't be a jerk", it is
important to note that there is no conditional part of the statement. It does not say "Do not be a jerk unless
they really deserve it", or "Do not actively be a jerk". Don't be a jerk even to other jerks. Also, it is a jerk thing to stand by and not
help where we can, even if we're not ourselves hindering them either. It's been said that "Every man is guilty
of the good he does not do" (which I read is a rather interpretive translation
of a quote by Voltaire), and I believe this.
On a related note, I cannot understand why people dismiss
help with the claim that “I don’t need any help.” To me, it is not a sign of weakness to accept
help. It does not demonstrate that you
could not complete the task without help, but it instead shows that you are
willing to facilitate both progress and camaraderie. As such, I believe we should help those who
don’t need it (but, of course, try more so to help those who do) and accept
help even if we don’t need it (as long as the offer is sincere, and we are not
taking advantage of our helper).
The third rule used to be phrased as “Learn something”, but
when I heard the Science Channel’s slogan, “Question everything”, I decide this
fit the purpose better. An alternative,
perhaps even better phrasing would be “Better yourself”, but many of the other
aspects of this particular phrasing are covered by the first two rules, so I
chose to stick with the more specific “Question everything”.
As far as its interpretation, it is pretty direct. It demands that we learn about our universe,
about each other, and about ourselves.
The only implications in the rule are its interaction with the first two
rules: that we use what we learn to better our lives and the lives of others.
The first three rules were the original list when I created
them (back when it still contained “Learn something”), and the last three were
added later, each at a different time. Rule
4, if I remember correctly, was actually added last, but being noticeably more
serious than the last two, was inserted in the middle of the list.
Moreover, the first three rules were not made to convince
myself to obey them. They were
essentially just a summary of what I had already learned to do with
myself. Rule 4, however, was added
because I felt I was spending too much time planning and thinking then
overthinking, and not enough time accomplishing anything. Of course, Rule 3 dictates that we reflect
upon what we can, but if this is all we do, then we’ll ultimately accomplish
nothing. As such, Rule 4 resulted as an
application of Rule 3 to itself, and a new rule was seen to be necessary. And, so, it is sometimes necessary to accept
that we cannot know all the variables before we act, and part of ‘questioning
everything’ is learning through experimentation. We must learn as we go, and adapt likewise,
thinking on our feet.
Rules 5 and 6 are, in many ways, extensions of Rule 1. Admittedly, unlike the other rules, they are
a bit more specific to my life. I
particularly enjoy these rules, and choose to maintain them as part of my rules,
but they also suggest that the rules can be personalized and adapted to anyone’s
needs or wants. Although I believe that
the first four are, for the most part, universal, they can sometimes benefit
from additional rules. I recommend,
though, that if you add your own rules, you keep it simple. Don’t try to create specific case-based rules
for everything, or else you’ll lose yourself in the specifics. The rules should not, at their core, dictate your
specific actions, but instead should motivate them.
As far as why I chose those particular rules, firstly, bacon
is its own reason. As for the robots in
hats, I will post here immediately following this entry something I wrote for a
Facebook page I created to endorse the cause, Robots in Hats, which describes
why I believe we should follow Rule 5.
No comments:
Post a Comment